Review of the 10 most popular distros

Jerry Davis jdawgaz at cox.net
Sun Apr 2 06:50:46 MST 2006


On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 00:38:07 -0800
"Joshua Zeidner" <jjzeidner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/1/06, Siri Amrit Kaur <tigerflag at tigerflag.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 01 April 2006 01:38 pm, Alan Dayley kindly wrote:
> > > Yes, your favorite might not be among the ten.  Yes, your
> > > favorite might be described "wrong."  Yes, this article is one
> > > person's opinion.  But it is still good info, I think.
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.linuxforums.org/reviews/overview_of_the_ten_major_linux_distribu
> > >tions.html
> > >
> > > Alan
> >
> > You mean we can't start a flame-war about it? Awwww...
> >
> 
> 
> Sure we can... KUBUNTU RULZ!
> 
> http://www.theonion.com/content/node/40076
> 
> -jmz

I do have one thing to say. I really don't care which distro I use, as
long as it detects my hardware and makes it successfully run on my
laptop.

laptops have always been a little harder, than desktops. Probably
partly because desktop parts are pretty standard. Anything goes in a
laptop for some reason.

Anyway, my gold standard for a distro, is one in which my Intel Pro
2915 network card is found, setup, and fully functioning when I boot.
To me, getting to the network is everything.

Mandriva 2005 LE did this right out of the box. What others can do that?

:-)

Jerry

-- 
Hobbit Name: Pimpernel Loamsdown
Registered Linux User: 275424
 
This email's random fortune: According to all the latest reports, there
was no truth in any of the
earlier reports.


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list