Iptables, FTP and firewall

Voltage Spike plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:55:18 -0700


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 18:36, der.hans wrote:
> The real question, though, is: do you really need ftp? Use http for anon
> downloading and ssh/scp/sftp for authorized uploading/downloading if you
> can.

Isn't there a larger overhead for http downloads (i.e. slower downloads)?  
Don't http connections also have to come down the line in order?  I know that 
http is easier for the user to work with, but what kind of performance 
penalty will you see for using it?

Just a curious mind. ;-)

- -- 
						Voltage Spike
      ,,,
     (. .)
- --ooO-(_)-Ooo--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9LQGppNoctRtUIRQRAlD3AJ4hogFd1CUXToqHgqtAj9M7B9RAjQCfQW0v
kOxvJEOB/UETlyjixTl3alI=
=a1/t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----