DHCP and Cox Cable

[Digital Wokan]

I was reading.  I saw the oops message you posted.  It doesn't change
the fact that the message did get to the list and I got to see what you
thought of a fellow list member giving you sound advice you "didn't feel
comfortable with" and them telling them to shove it up their ass.
I keep holding out hope for the human race.  And then I read my email.

"Dr. Ghastly" wrote:
> 
> heh. If you read closer, you'll notice I wasnt talking to you.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Digital Wokan" <wokan@cox.net>
> To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable
> 
> > I see why you chose the name Ghastly.  Not being comfortable with Linux
> > (be it GUI or CLI) is no reason to tell people to use their advice for
> > an enema.  (Though someone in this conversation is in Ghastly need of
> > one.)
> > Fortunately, I don't need to add you to my trash can.  I'm wearing the
> > latest in designer flame-proof underwear, so feel free to tell me to do
> > what you want.  Also, don't forget to add "Running Linux" to your Amazon
> > wish list (since you're in need of comfort).  That way, if you don't
> > like the book's advice, you can shove it up your own ass.
> >
> > "Dr. Ghastly" wrote:
> > >
> > > Excuse me. Im not 100% comfortable with the gui interface of Linux, not
> to
> > > mentiont he console. I do believe you can take that statement and shove
> it
> > > up your ass.
> > >
> > > Do not bother replying. You have been added to my trash can.
> > >
> > > ******************************************************************
> > > Once you start down the dark path, forever will it
> > > dominate your destiny, consume you it will...
> > > ******************************************************************
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Nancy Sollars" <dnancy2@qwest.net>
> > > To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:32 PM
> > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable
> > >
> > > > when you run the Linux Seti daemon you can run it with verbose
> messeging
> > > it
> > > > will tell you when it d/l packets uploading packets and which pages
> its
> > > > currently processing ..
> > > >
> > > > and yes it works in text mode .. sheesh man not wanting to say RTFM //
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Dr. Ghastly" <drghastly@cox.net>
> > > > To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:05 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, another / then. I cant remember the command to see what jobs are
> > > > > running..?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ******************************************************************
> > > > > Once you start down the dark path, forever will it
> > > > > dominate your destiny, consume you it will...
> > > > > ******************************************************************
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Digital Wokan" <wokan@home.com>
> > > > > To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:38 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Seti@Home works differently on Linux than Windows.  The actual
> > > seti@home
> > > > > > program runs in the background with no visual indications of what
> it's
> > > > > > doing ('ps ax' being a good way to see if it's running).  There's
> a
> > > GUI
> > > > > > you can install that can give you a visual indication of
> seti@home's
> > > > > > progress once the program is running in the background.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Dr. Ghastly" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That reminds me. Im trying to get Seti@home running on My
> mandrake
> > > 8.X
> > > > > box,
> > > > > > > but when i click on it, it appears to do nothing, anyone have
> any
> > > > > > > ideas/coments to clue me in?
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Jim" <farli@unitywave.com>
> > > > > > > To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:33 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rest assured that this is not a Linux-only group or list.  We
> > > > welcome
> > > > > MS
> > > > > > > > malcontents, curious Apple-ets, and even bsd-ers.  We are an
> equal
> > > > > > > > opportunity group who will answer all questions in the blatant
> > > > attempt
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > convert.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TMTM
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sunday 27 January 2002 12:19, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>yeah but only the people running M$. Linux/*Nix is not
> > > troubled
> > > > ..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > .>>Since your on this list i would hope you run Linux ( if
> no
> > > then
> > > > > what
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>doing here )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Obviously that wasnt addressed to ME, however:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Uh. Im looking at this on a Windows 2000 machine. Im on this
> > > list
> > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > Im interested in Linux.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm sure everyone else on this list would feel the same. I
> didnt
> > > > > realize
> > > > > > > > > that being on a PLUG, you HAD to run Linux ONLY otherwise
> the
> > > > LINUX
> > > > > > > NAZI's
> > > > > > > > > would come looking for you. Grow up.
> > > > > > > > - --
> > > > > > > > Jim
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Freedom is worth preserving