Linux doomed

Charles A. Reynolds plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:43:57 -0800


One thing I would change in the article is where it says "rival operating
system should exist" to "rival operating system ever existed".

I do understand what satire means.

Under estimating your competition is your Achilles heal.


----- Original Message -----
From: John (EBo) David <ebo@eagle.west.asu.edu>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: Linux doomed


> Eric wrote:
> >
> > This is the stupidest thing that I've read in a while.  Microsoft
> > > has been
> > > jabbing linux for a while now, so why would anybody take them
> > > seriously if
> > > somebody from there might have said that Linux is doomed.  This
> > > seems more
> > > like tabloid news to me.  I really don't think that anybody in the
Linux
> > > industry would take them seriously, especially if Linux is
> > > steadily gaining
> > > market share.  This is an article intended to spook people.
> > >
> >
> > Uhhh..........................................you're joking, right?
>
> When I read it I assumed that it was a tongue in cheek joke...
>
>   EBo --
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss