sklyarov

Eric plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:07:11 -0800


let me re-phrase my comment that jurisdiction looks less shaky: jurisdiction
over Elmsoft looks ok.  but how do they get jurisdiction over Sklyarov
*personally*, i dunno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Digital
> Wokan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:57 AM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: sklyarov
>
>
> I've actually been wondering that one myself.  Would the fed be willing
> to chalk up a loss on purpose to help get a law struck down that their
> own people didn't agree with.  Since Adobe has officially backed out of
> supporting prosecution, could the prosecutors get away with doing less
> than their best to further an alternative goal?
>
> "der.hans" wrote:
> > Those prosecutors might actually be on our side :).
> > ciao,
> > der.hans
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail
> doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>