redhat tries apt-get
Joel Dudley
joel@silverw.com
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:47:53 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C02397.DDCFF080
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am just saying that Debian provides a very robust apt-get soution for =
free. I have no problem with RedHat making money, but charging money =
for updates seems weird to me. I know you can still update manually, =
but why charge for this new feature? I would gladly pay redhat for =
support, but not updates. I mean even M$ doesnt charge for NT service =
packs. Am I looking at this thing the right way? I am no businessman =
and I have nothing against companies like RedHat finding ways to make =
money and putting out pretty decent software. But this still rubs me =
the wrong way. Maybe someone could enlighten me. =20
- Joel
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Lucas Vogel=20
To: 'plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us'=20
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: RE: redhat tries apt-get
So what's the big deal?
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Dudley [mailto:joel@silverw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:13 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Subject: redhat tries apt-get
Looks like RH 7.0 is going to make a stab at the whole apt-get idea =
in 7.0, but you have to pay for it? What is up with that?? One more =
reason for me to switch to Debian.
- Joel
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C02397.DDCFF080
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am just saying that Debian provides a =
very robust=20
apt-get soution for free. I have no problem with RedHat making =
money, but=20
charging money for updates seems weird to me. I know you can still =
update=20
manually, but why charge for this new feature? I would gladly pay =
redhat=20
for support, but not updates. I mean even M$ doesnt charge for NT =
service=20
packs. Am I looking at this thing the right way? I am no =
businessman=20
and I have nothing against companies like RedHat finding ways to make =
money and=20
putting out pretty decent software. But this still rubs me the =
wrong=20
way. Maybe someone could enlighten me. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>- Joel</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A href=3D"mailto:lvogel@exponent.com" =
title=3Dlvogel@exponent.com>Lucas Vogel</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
href=3D"mailto:'plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us'"=20
=
title=3Dplug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>'plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.ph=
oenix.az.us'</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, September 20, =
2000 8:29=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: redhat tries =
apt-get</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D313593503-21092000>So=20
what's the big deal?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Joel Dudley [<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:joel@silverw.com">mailto:joel@silverw.com</A>]<BR><B>Sent:=
</B>=20
Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:13 PM<BR><B>To:</B> <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us">plug-discuss@lists.=
PLUG.phoenix.az.us</A><BR><B>Subject:</B>=20
redhat tries apt-get<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Looks like RH 7.0 is going to make =
a stab at=20
the whole apt-get idea in 7.0, but you have to pay for it? =
What is up=20
with that?? One more reason for me to switch to =
Debian.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-=20
Joel</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C02397.DDCFF080--