PGP/MIME test

Nathan Saper natedog@well.com
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 23:25:39 -0700


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:26:43PM -0700, Michael F. March wrote:
> For the love of God, please use standard PGP encoding.
> 
> MIME encoding is a pain in the ass for us Outlook / Outlook Express 
> users.

Fair enough.  If PGP/MIME causes some clients to choke, I'll use standard.

Does anyone have any idea why the mutt developers chose to implement
PGP/MIME, not standard PGP encoding?

- --
Nathan Saper
natedog@well.com (PGP OK)
Fingerprint (0x9AD0F382): 743D FE2C 7F2E 7CAE 4A5F 0B19 D855 B205 9AD0 F382
Fidonet: 1:114/59.10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5wG9A2FWyBZrQ84IRApU8AJ9QyUXFvD0Eae2o0iQ+28TK9rzhbQCgsEuZ
izX88/qfzoSO9p/caNMz61E=
=sqle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----