ARTICLE: Delayed by feature creep, it's...Linux?

Furmanek, Greg Greg.Furmanek@hit.cendant.com
Fri, 5 May 2000 11:17:25 -0400


I'm sorry but people who are saying Gartner Group is reliable 
source of info ( in other articles ) are not the best source
themselves.

The Wolf

-----Original Message-----
From: der.hans [mailto:PLUGd@LuftHans.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 9:54 PM
To: plug1
Subject: Re: ARTICLE: Delayed by feature creep, it's...Linux?


On Thu, 4 May 2000, Lucas Vogel wrote:

> http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2560521,00.html

`the Linux camp had until recently enjoyed a fairly regular nine- to
12-month update cycle.'

For the kernel? Since when? :)

`"everybody knew that the two and a half years between 2.0 and 2.2 was too
painful," Torvalds said.'

Maybe she should read her own article :).

It's a shame it's been pushed back a few more months, though.

ciao,

der.hans
-- 
#  der.hans@LuftHans.com   home.pages.de/~lufthans/   www.OpNIX.com
#  Science is magic explained. - der.hans


_______________________________________________
Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss