you have 2 options, Im my case I used an ubiquity edgerouter lite and it has Wan +2 Lan ports and full commercial tools for management. but it can be set to amd a dmz on one port, and your network on the other port in very little time. https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-lite/ If you want the All in one route, the other one I have used with great success is the netgear Nighthawk c7000, I only retired it when I moved from Cable to Fiber. https://www.netgear.com/home/products/networking/cable-modems-routers/C7000.aspx On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:04 AM Bob Elzer wrote: > I need advice on a docs is 3.0 cable modem. > > I just bought a Motorola mb7220-10, it turns out there is nothing that is > configurable. > > It's hard coded to 192.168.100 and I want 192.168.0 > > There's no DMZ or port forwarding. This was not clear when I ordered it. > > So I'm looking for one that I can configure with a DMZ and set to > 192.168.0, I don't need WiFi and I'd like it to cost under $100. My > download speed will only be 30mb so I don't need docsis 3.1 > > Anyone have any recommendations? > > Thanks > Bob > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 1:36 PM Stephen Partington > wrote: > >> In some places they even have fiber to the prem. (me) >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:02 PM Michael Butash >> wrote: >> >>> You need to make sure your modem supports 3.1 too, don't forget that. >>> >>> Cox has just recently finished upgrading to all the new 3.1 hardware >>> here, and phoenix tends to be their technology leader market due to being >>> their biggest, so I'd be surprised if comcast has done more rural areas. >>> They always seem to be the first to fight any sort of rural network >>> legislation as they hate wasting their capital on non-rich areas, so make >>> sure they can even support the 8-24 channels down needed for those speeds. >>> You'd be amazed how screwed up cable plants can be in rural/old areas that >>> in some cases, they just cannot support the rates. Tempe was like this for >>> a long while here due to the original podunk cable co that built it. >>> >>> Cox is actually one of the better cable MSO's out there sadly. My first >>> job in tech in '99 was @home networks that pioneered cable modem tech, and >>> taught the cable behemoths about that little internet thing, and dealing >>> with them all from comcast, cox, intermedia, att, and others, cox was >>> always one of the least crappy of them. So much I even worked for them >>> after for a bit (more crappy to work for imho). Not perfect, but >>> definitely better. If you like to pirate media, oddly they were one of the >>> strongest to reject lawsuits, abuse subpoenas, and other media cartel >>> incursions on human rights, where comcast (being the ultimate media whore >>> thanks to corrupt/owned fcc) is the opposite... >>> >>> That said, I've been having more frequent outages (including 2 >>> yesterday) with Cox, and they're steadily warning and charging me for >>> bandwidth now, so I'm having Centurylink installed to check out that is >>> almost double the speed and $25 less than my cox bill now. As much as I >>> hate Centurylink, they don't have the bandwidth caps, that started with >>> Comcast coincidentally, and Cox can stick it now (pun intended) that they >>> impose them too if I'm just going to go over monthly. Joy of having both >>> services at least temporarily is I can steer traffic out either/both with >>> my Fortigate firewall with sd-wan features, so going to play a month or two >>> before I can one or the other to see... >>> >>> -mb >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Jim wrote: >>> >>>> I found out Tuesday what was causing me to not get the speed I was told >>>> I should get. Once again the Comcast guy I was talking to said he wanted >>>> to send out a repairman to find out why I wasn't getting the 150 Mbps >>>> everything told him I should be getting. Tuesday morning the repairman >>>> showed up with his supervisor. The supervisor told me the 150 Mbps speed >>>> is for customers in areas that are served with a docsis 3.1 network, but >>>> where I live is served by a docsis 3.1 network. Because of this I get 100 >>>> Mbps, but could get 150 if I wanted to pay more. Then he said the network >>>> in this area isn't able to supply everyone with 150 Mbps, and no he doesn't >>>> know when this area will be upgraded. I was amazed that all the corporate >>>> people I talked to didn't know that this was the case. They all said I >>>> should be getting 150. >>>> >>>> After the repairman and his boss left, I called and emailed the >>>> corporate people who had been telling me I should be getting 150 and told >>>> them what the local supervisor said. Later one of them called back and >>>> agreed with me that since I had been told I should be getting 150, that he >>>> would give it to me for the price I'm paying now. >>>> >>>> >>>> Is Cox as fscked up as Comcast? >>>> --------------------------------------------------- >>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------- >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> >> >> >> -- >> A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from >> rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button. >> >> Stephen >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss -- A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button. Stephen