> > Users are recommended to update to Firefox 57 > > Looks like I'm good here. I'm honestly surprised you can pull this off in JavaScript. Must be a true JS wizard if you can pull this off. Looks like I'm setting my Updates Manager to check every 30 days now, until all this stuff has been resolved, since some apps don't look like they can get a patch until near the end of the month. Andrew McRobb Full-time Software Developer Part-time Freelancer mcrobb.info On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:45 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. < herminio.hernandezjr@gmail.com> wrote: > Mozilla confirms this bug is exploitable. I am making sure JavaScript is > off by default and only enabled in pages where I want it to. > > https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/mozilla- > confirms-web-based-execution-vector-for-meltdown-and-spectre-attacks/ > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:36 AM, der.hans wrote: > >> Am 05. Jan, 2018 schwätzte Herminio Hernandez, Jr. so: >> >> moin moin, >> >> Yeah, JavaScript's annoying. I've been using NoScript to block it outright >> for years. I only allow certain sites to have JavaScript. Some of those >> sites only get JavaScript when I'm trying to checkout. Some get their own >> browser instance before I allow them to have JavaScript. >> >> Recently JavaScript has been used to do bitcoin mining via web browsers >> and it's had several security issues over the years. >> >> It can't escape the sandbox if it never runs :). >> >> ciao, >> >> der.hans >> >> >> Damn Stallman was right again >>> >>> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/javascript-trap.ja-en.html >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Andrew McRobb >>> wrote: >>> >>> JavaScript being the Raccoon? heh >>>> >>>> Andrew McRobb >>>> Full-time Software Developer >>>> Part-time Freelancer >>>> mcrobb.info >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Ed wrote: >>>> >>>> More like raccoons to oranges... >>>>> 8) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:59 PM, der.hans wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Am 04. Jan, 2018 schwätzte Andrew McRobb so: >>>>>> >>>>>> moin moin Andrew, >>>>>> >>>>>> cool, sounds like having umatrix or NoScript blocking javascript is >>>>>> >>>>> still >>>>> >>>>>> sufficient. >>>>>> >>>>>> Need to make sure